Skip to main content

“You Have Zero Credibility”, BART Exec Unleashes Fury on Clipper After Learning Unpaid Bill Caused Outage

 


“You Have Zero Credibility”, BART Exec Unleashes Fury on Clipper After Learning Unpaid Bill Caused Outage

You’re running one of the busiest transit systems in the country. Your riders are already frustrated, fare hikes, delays, the usual big‑city headaches. Then, out of nowhere, the entire payment system goes dark. Ticket machines freeze. Fare gates yawn open for free. For 27 agonizing hours, you’re hemorrhaging revenue while thousands of commuters stand confused at station entrances.

Now imagine learning the cause.

Not a sophisticated cyberattack. Not a once‑in‑a‑century hardware failure.

An unpaid telephone bill.

That’s exactly what happened to Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) in May 2026. And when BART General Manager Robert Powers discovered that the Clipper card meltdown traced back to its contractor, Cubic Transportation Systems, simply failing to pay AT&T … he did not hold back.

“Cubic not paying their bill? Are you kidding me? That’s ridiculous. BART is so done with Cubic right now. You have zero credibility, Cubic. Zero.”

That outburst, captured at a Clipper Executive Board meeting, instantly became the defining moment of the debacle, and a rallying cry for anyone who’s ever dealt with a vendor who just … dropped the ball.

Let’s walk through what happened, why it matters, and what it says about the hidden fragility of the systems we rely on every single day.

“Zero Credibility!”, The Moment Everything Boiled Over

The meeting room was tense before Powers even spoke.

For months, frustration with Cubic had been bubbling just beneath the surface. The company, a global transportation technology giant, had been hired to build and maintain the Bay Area’s new “next‑generation” Clipper system, a major upgrade intended to make fare payment faster and more flexible. But the rollout had been plagued with delays, software glitches, and a growing list of unresolved issues.

Then came the May outage.

According to a staff memo obtained by KQED, on May 18, Cubic and BART discovered a network outage affecting all of the transit agency’s Clipper readers. Customers couldn’t purchase or add value to their cards at BART vending machines, and transactions at fare gates were delayed to a crawl.

The cause? A network circuit that connected BART’s data center to Cubic’s infrastructure had stopped working. And why did it stop?

Cubic’s own chief operations officer, Lalit Singh, explained it to the board with an almost jaw‑dropping matter‑of‑factness: “We have multiple accounts with AT&T. On one of the accounts, the payments were not made, and we couldn’t find where the circuits, which are in support of the BART system, were because they were not in our account system.”

Let that sink in. A $124 million fare collection contractor lost track of its own network circuits. Because the bills weren’t paid.

That’s when Powers exploded. “BART is so done with Cubic right now.”

What Actually Happened That Morning?

Okay, let’s pull back the hood and look at the mechanics.

The Clipper card is the Bay Area’s universal transit payment system, like New York’s MetroCard or London’s Oyster, but covering more than 20 different agencies: BART, Muni, Caltrain, AC Transit, ferries, you name it. In a typical morning, more than 800,000 riders use Clipper to tap in and out of trains and buses.

The system runs on a combination of hardware (the readers at fare gates) and software that talks to backend servers. Those servers use dedicated AT&T network circuits to exchange data between station equipment and Cubic’s central systems.

On May 18, those circuits went dead, not because of a fire or a fiber cut, but because AT&T had terminated service on an account whose bill had gone unpaid. Cubic had somehow lost track of which circuits belonged to which accounts, and when the payment lapsed, so did BART’s ability to process transactions.

Here’s where it gets even stranger: The outage was discovered when station agents started noticing that ticket machines were unusable and that tapping a Clipper card at the gate resulted in a delay of up to several seconds, an eternity in transit time. Some gates simply stopped responding, forcing agents to open emergency exits and wave people through for free.

The Metropolitan Transportation Commission, which oversees Clipper, confirmed the outage across all operators just after 7 a.m. and warned riders to prepare an alternative form of payment. But with the entire system down, there wasn’t much of an alternative.

The human toll: Imagine running late for work. You swipe your Clipper card, nothing happens. You try again. Nothing. A station agent shrugs and waves you through a side gate. You get on the train, but you’re uneasy, will you be charged later? Will you have to call customer service to sort it out?

Now multiply that feeling by hundreds of thousands of people.


It Wasn’t the First Time, And Won’t Be the Last

The May 2026 outage wasn’t an isolated freak event.

Just a year earlier, in July 2025, a separate Clipper‑wide crash forced every Bay Area transit agency to offer free rides for an entire morning. That outage was blamed on an old calendar‑programming error in the legacy system, but the damage was already done, BART alone lost $382,000 in fare revenue that day. Across all agencies, the tab came to about $658,000.

Then, in September 2025, another systemwide failure stranded hundreds of thousands of riders and prompted a formal public apology from the BART Board of Directors. At that point, board members were already openly questioning whether Cubic was capable of delivering a reliable system.

The pattern is unmistakable:

  • July 2025 : Clipper calendar glitch → free rides for all → $658k lost.
  • September 2025 : Another systemwide BART outage → hundreds of thousands stranded → formal apology.
  • May 2026 : Unpaid AT&T bill → 27‑hour outage → the “zero credibility” blowup.

Each time, the response from Cubic has been the same: we’ll fix it, we’re sorry, it won’t happen again. Each time, something new breaks.

Public Trust vs. Private Contractors

If this were just about one contractor messing up one bill, it would be a funny anecdote, the kind of story you tell at happy hour to make your own job feel less chaotic.

But it’s not just one bill. It’s a symptom of something deeper.

Governments and transit agencies across the country have been outsourcing critical infrastructure to private companies for decades. The logic is sound: private firms bring expertise, efficiency, and economies of scale. In exchange, they get long‑term contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

The problem is what happens when those firms stop feeling accountable.

Real‑world metaphor: Imagine hiring a plumber to re‑pipe your entire house. You pay them upfront. They install the pipes, but every few weeks, a leak springs somewhere else. You call them, they patch it, and the leak moves to a different wall. Meanwhile, you’re living with buckets under the sink and a growing sense that maybe you should have just done it yourself.

That’s where BART finds itself. The agency has invested enormous resources in the next‑generation Clipper upgrade, a project that was supposed to be fully operational by late 2025. But nearly six months after its launch date, the system continues to cause problems for riders and agencies alike, with reported inconsistencies in financial reconciliation, fare inspection devices, and customer service software.

And the upgrade itself has been stalled. Cubic had previously identified May 30 as the target date for beginning bulk migrations to the new system. That date came and went without progress. “Even just this morning, there was another back‑office database issue that impacted Clipper sales channels for approximately one hour before Cubic restored operations,” said Angus Davol, assistant director of Clipper development and budget.

You don’t need to be a transit wonk to see the pattern.

What Cubic’s Failure Cost the Bay Area (Hint: More Than Money)

Let’s put a few numbers on the board.

BART’s $382,000 Day of Free Rides

During the July 2025 outage alone, BART lost $382,000 in fare revenue, nearly $400,000 just for that single morning of free rides. Multiply that by three major outages in less than a year, and the toll climbs quickly.

For context, BART is already struggling with pandemic‑era ridership declines and rising operational costs. Every dollar that leaks out because of a contractor’s negligence is a dollar that can’t go toward cleaner trains, newer railcars, or better station security.

Morning Commute Chaos, A Timeline

Let’s walk through the morning of May 18, 2026.

  • 5:00 AM : The AT&T circuit fails. Ticket machines go offline. Most riders haven’t yet noticed.
  • 7:15 AM : The Metropolitan Transportation Commission confirms a systemwide outage affecting all transit operators. Riders start posting about it on social media.
  • 8:00 AM : Station agents at Montgomery Street and other downtown stations begin opening emergency gates to keep people moving. Delays ripple across the network.
  • 9:30 AM : BART advises riders to use the Clipper app, online accounts, Apple Wallet, or contactless bank cards instead of physical tickets. But many casual riders don’t have those alternatives set up.
  • 12:00 PM : The cause is traced to the unpaid AT&T bill. Cubic begins scrambling to restore the circuit.
  • 8:00 PM : The system is finally back online, 27 hours after it first failed.

For an entire day, the Bay Area’s transit network ran on goodwill and station agents holding doors open. It worked, barely. But it wasn’t sustainable.


What’s Next for Clipper, Cubic, and BART?

So where do we go from here?

For Cubic: The company is on thin ice. At the same meeting where Powers delivered his “zero credibility” tirade, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Andrew Fremier announced that the commission was preparing for a closed‑session meeting to “discuss contractual remedies.” That’s the kind of bureaucratic language that usually means: lawyers are sharpening their pencils.

Oakland resident Bryan Culbertson spoke for many frustrated riders when he pleaded with the board during public comment to “sever ties with Cubic” so that the region could have “a future where we’re not having these meetings over and over and over again of Cubic failing.”

For Clipper: The good news is that the next‑generation system, known as Clipper 2.0, does have real benefits when it works. It allows tap‑to‑pay with contactless credit cards, instant value loading, and seamless transfers between agencies. Since December 2025, 1.7 million Clipper cards have been upgraded to the new system, and 45% of Clipper fares are now paid through Clipper 2.0 accounts.

The bad news is that those numbers aren’t high enough, and every time a major outage happens, it erodes trust in the entire project.

For BART: The agency has already announced it will seek reimbursement for the lost revenue from the July 2025 outage. It’s a safe bet that similar claims will follow for the May 2026 disaster. But money is only part of the equation. What BART really needs is a partner it can trust.

The Final Farewell to Cubic?

When you hear “a global tech contractor forgot to pay its phone bill,” the instinct is to laugh. It’s absurd. It’s the kind of oversight that gets you written up at a small business, not a company managing transit payments for millions of people.

But the laughter fades when you remember the human cost, the lost wages from missed connections, the stress of uncertain commutes, and the slow erosion of faith that any of these systems will work when you need them most.

Robert Powers’ outburst wasn’t just a moment of anger. It was the sound of a public servant realizing that the contractor he’s supposed to rely on doesn’t take the job seriously.

“Zero credibility.”

Those two words are going to follow Cubic for a long time.

And for the rest of us, this incident is a reminder: the systems that move our cities are only as strong as the people who maintain them. When those people forget to pay the bills, everyone pays the price.


Have you been affected by a Clipper outage? Share your story in the comments below, and if you want to stay updated on transit tech and infrastructure accountability, sign up for our newsletter. No unpaid bills required.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your House Is About to Become a Mini Data Center, And It Could Slash Your Electric Bill

  Your House Is About to Become a Mini Data Center, And It Could Slash Your Electric Bill Nvidia, PulteGroup, and startup Span are quietly building something wild: a network of AI servers bolted to the sides of American homes. Here’s a sentence I never thought I’d write:  the smartest place to put an AI data center might be right next to your water heater. I know. It sounds absurd. Data centers are  supposed  to be massive, windowless, power-hungry monoliths squatting in industrial parks, the kind of thing entire towns protest against. They’re not supposed to hum quietly beside your azalea bushes while you grill burgers on a Sunday afternoon. And yet, that is exactly what’s happening. A San Francisco startup called  Span  — best known for making sleek smart electrical panels, has partnered with  Nvidia  and homebuilding giant  PulteGroup  to launch something called  XFRA : a distributed data center that puts enterprise-grade A...

The Internet’s Most Powerful Archiving Tool Is in Peril, Here’s Why You Should Care

  The Internet’s Most Powerful Archiving Tool Is in Peril, Here’s Why You Should Care You’ve probably used it without even realizing it. Maybe you were looking for an old blog post from 2008 that has long since vanished from the live web. Maybe you needed to prove that a company quietly changed its terms of service after you signed up. Or maybe, like millions of others, you just wanted a hit of nostalgia, a glimpse of what the internet looked like when Flash intros were a thing and everyone had a guestbook. That magical time machine you were using? That’s the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine. And right now, as of April 2026, it is fighting for its life. We tend to think of the internet as permanent. We imagine our tweets and Facebook posts floating out there forever, haunting us. But the truth is a lot scarier: the web is incredibly fragile. Websites go offline every day. Governments scrub pages. Companies fold. And when they do, whole chunks of our collective history just… ...

The Real Price of a Tractor: Beyond Trump's Criticism and Toward Smarter Farming

  The Real Price of a Tractor: Beyond Trump's Criticism and Toward Smarter Farming The Headline vs. The Reality on the Ground So, you’ve probably seen the headlines. President Trump says farm equipment has gotten “too expensive,” pointing a finger at environmental regulations and calling for manufacturers like John Deere to lower their prices. In almost the same breath, he announces a  $12 billion aid package  designed to help farmers bridge financial gaps. It’s a powerful political moment. But if you’re actually running a farm, your reaction might be more complicated. A sigh, maybe. A nod of understanding, followed by the much more pressing, practical question: “Okay, but what does this mean for my bottom line  tomorrow ?” John Deere’s CFO, Josh Jepsen, responded not with a argument, but with a different frame. He gently pushed back, suggesting that while regulations are a factor, the  true path to affordability isn’t a lower sticker price, but smarter technol...